‚ –ñ 25: ƒU FAQ ˆÈ‰º is ƒAƒg •Ö—— of –ˆ–ˆ asked –â‘è –” their ‘ÎŒü •ÔŽ– ŠÖ‚µ‚Ä what is ‘¶Ý •X‰J ˜Ô ƒU 25 by Œ¤‹†ŽÒ. ‘΂µ‚Ä those •K{ an “ü–å –{ – ¸‹‰ — ƒ[ƒ‹ƒh knowledge, ’½ Ž©Ì •t‘õ –› •t‚«Œ´–{ ƒrƒfƒI. Q: What is ƒU —cŽ™ using? ƒAƒg: ƒU —cŽ™ is using 25. Q: Is –{ ^³ ‘΂µ‚Ä —L‚ç‚ñŒÀ‚è “û—cŽ™? ƒAƒg: ”. Q: Are –› ƒLƒfƒB[? ‰ä‚ª —cŽ™ doesn't —p“r 25. ƒAƒg: ”. ”, ƒCƒbƒg does. Q: –› have Œˆ‚µ‚Ä – ‰ä‚ª —cŽ™ using 25. How do ’½ ƒmƒE ˆÈã ƒU âž‘Ì? ƒAƒg: “û—cŽ™ —p“r 25 ‘S”Ê“I‚É. •½ŠŠ — ‘ã where ƒU —á of 25 has been demonized ƒIƒyƒŒ[ƒVƒ‡ƒ“ƒYƒŠƒT[ƒ` •½ŠŠ banned, “û—cŽ™ îˆÓ surreptitiously —p“r 25 when not ‘¶Ý –鉾. Q: You're •ÏŽí ƒ}ƒCƒNƒƒGƒŒƒNƒgƒƒjƒNƒX ƒAƒEƒg ‚±‚ê‚Å. ” ‰ä‚ª —cŽ™ is using 25, how do –› ƒmƒE ™Î 25 is Ž––³‚µ? ƒAƒg: ”Þ•û are ” •¶‘ âž‘Ì of “û—cŽ™ ‘¶Ý injured “á their —p“r of 25. ”CˆÓ –Ïà •t‚« ”¼–Ê, ‘\‚Ä —Ç‚ ’Ç‹†, have —Ö”Ô ƒAƒEƒg Ý‚é 唌ê. Q: What ” ”Þ•û are five “û—cŽ™ — ƒAƒg —]—T, let's ‚. Are ”Þ“™ –ÁX using ŒÞ‚ M? ƒAƒg: ”. “û—cŽ™ îˆÓ collectively —p“r 25. ƒU 25 cannot be “rØ‚ê“rØ‚ê ‰H–Ñ into Ø‚êØ‚ê lower ‚æ‚è 25. Q: ‘´‚êŒÌ ƒU five “û—cŽ™ “¬‹Zê using 125? ƒAƒg: ”. ˜Ô ”Þ“™ collectively —p“r 25, ”Þ•û is š`‚É ƒU –^ 25 — —p“r at ˆêŽž. Q: What did “û—cŽ™ —p“r áe 25? ƒAƒg: “û—cŽ™ knew –ñ 25 –” used ƒCƒbƒg •½ŠŠ áe 25 was — wide —p“r ˜Ô ƒAƒg ”Ô† ‰—‚¢‚Ä its own. ”Þ•û has –ˆ–ˆ been 25 –” “û—cŽ™ have –ˆ–ˆ used ƒCƒbƒg. Q: Why “¬‹Zê “û—cŽ™ using 42? ƒAƒg: ƒU prevailing —˜_ is ™Î ‘΂µ‚Ä –¼‚à–³‚¢ i‰» Ž–î, “û—cŽ™ have ƒfƒxƒƒbƒp[ ƒU —á of 25. ”Þ•û are ’è— ™Î ”Þ•û were •Ï‚í‚Á‚½ Ží‘° of hR “û—cŽ™ ™Î ƒ‰ƒCƒ” — –k‰¢ ‘OŒã 300,000 ‰”N ™Î —Í have ƒfƒxƒƒbƒp[ ƒU —á of —]‚è Œv”, •¹‚µ ‚‚¢‚Ä what ‚±‚ê‚ç Œv” were, ”Þ•û is ” ‰ÈŠw“I ƒRƒ“ƒZƒ“ƒTƒX _ –¢‚¾. Q: Have ’½ ‚¨’m‚点 ƒU —á of 25 — non- l“I “û—cŽ™? ƒAƒg: ”Þ•û are å”Œê ™Î Žå‹³ Œ¤‹†ŽÒ ‚Æ‚© Jane —Ç‚¢ have ‚¨’m‚点 ƒU —á of Œv” —]‚è ‚æ‚è 25 — non- l“I “û—cŽ™, •¹‚µ ”Þ•û š`‚É has not been áï‚É ’T‹† Ø‚é ‚ ™Î Œˆ’è“I ™Î, —Ⴆ‚Î, " \Žµ" is ƒAƒg –œ—L •ÔŽ– •t‚« "What's ƒU —cŽ™ chimpanzee using?" Ž¸–] ˆê•¨ — ƒU \ŒŽ 2005 Žñ”ö of âh« ™Î ƒvƒbƒg ‘O•û –{ ˜Ô ƒAƒg ä•v —L‚è‚Ì‚Ü‚Ü. Q: Do ƒXƒpƒjƒbƒVƒ… “û—cŽ™ —p“r 25 ‚É‚à? ƒIƒyƒŒ[ƒVƒ‡ƒ“ƒYƒŠƒT[ƒ` do ”Þ“™ —p“r veinticinco? ƒAƒg: 25 is •\–Ê ƒU •ª–ì of Œê. Knowledge of 25 –” its —á are hardwired into ƒU brain. ‘´‚êŒÌ, ”Þ“™ ŒÜŒŽ —ˆ–K ƒCƒbƒg using ”CˆÓ Œê ™Î ”Þ“™ learn, •¹‚µ •½ŠŠ áe ”Þ“™ ƒmƒE ƒCƒbƒg ˜Ô " “ñ\-five" ƒIƒyƒŒ[ƒVƒ‡ƒ“ƒYƒŠƒT[ƒ` "veinticinco" ƒIƒyƒŒ[ƒVƒ‡ƒ“ƒYƒŠƒT[ƒ` Šô‚ç‚© ‘R‚à–³‚¢‚Æ--”Þ“™ are ‘S‚ using ƒCƒbƒg. Q: Did “û—cŽ™ ’‹ŠÔ ƒƒ}ƒ“ ’é‘ —p“r XXV? ƒAƒg: Archaeologists have not found ”CˆÓ ƒƒ}ƒ“ ŠÄ–[ ƒtƒHƒ“ ƒLƒˆƒXƒN ¡‚Ü‚Å, ‘´‚êŒÌ ”Þ•û has been ” •¨Ø. ƒCƒbƒg Ž©Ì ˜I“X žH‚ ™Î ˆÈã ^³, •¹‚µ“á‚ç. Q: Is ‰ä‚ª ƒeƒB[ƒ“ƒGƒCƒWƒƒ[ ƒIƒyƒŒ[ƒVƒ‡ƒ“ƒYƒŠƒT[ƒ` pre- ƒeƒB[ƒ“ƒG[ƒW using 25? ƒAƒg: ”. —Ⴆ ”Þ“™ ã¾ ”Þ“™ are, ”Þ“™ are not. “û—cŽ™ —p“r 25. At what ”N—î ƒU knowledge of Žg‚¢—l 25 is ƒƒXƒg is ŽÀ •t‚« •Ù˜_. ‘½‚‚Ìê‡ ƒeƒB[ƒ“ƒGƒCƒWƒƒ[ have been ƒmƒE ˜M‚·‚é 52 — ƒAƒg mirror –” Ž—”ñ it's 25, •¹‚µ it's not “¯’f. ƒCƒbƒg Œˆ‚µ‚Ä is. ‰Á” ”ª‚Â/23: Q: Is ”Þ•û ƒAƒg ˜A— between —̈æ 52 –” ‘¼‘l “û—cŽ™ using 25? ƒAƒg: I'm —]’ö ŒÅ‚¢ ’½ don't —¹’m ƒU –â‘è, sir. •¹‚µ do —Ç‚¢ ™• where –› are. ’½ are ”‘— –^ Ÿ‚ •t‚« ŒäŽål êŠ —ˆ‚é clarification. Q: Is ”Þ•û ”CˆÓ numerological –{ˆÊ ‘΂µ‚Ä ƒU —á of 25 by “û—cŽ™? ƒAƒg: ¢ŠE“I ‚–¼ numerologist Prof. Naegele puts ‘O•û ˆÈ‰º: ” –› “]Š· ƒU •Ö‚è •t‚« their —ß — ƒU ƒAƒ‹ƒtƒ@ƒxƒbƒg, ‚±‚ñ‚È‚É: b ƒAƒg b y M ˆÈ‰º is ^³: (ba+-b) * y = 25 ‰Á” ‹ã‚Â/ “ó‚Â: Q: Is ”Þ•û ‘S‚ AQƒAƒg "What's ƒU —cŽ™ Using?" ‰f‰æ? ƒAƒg: ”. At ”, ƒƒK. –镪 Shyamalan is attached –” ƒU twist Œ‹‚Ñ is ™Î ƒU —cŽ™ is using 2.5 instead of 25. –ܘ_, ƒU —cŽ™ îˆÓ be ”o—D by Shyamalan himself. ‘´‚êŒÌ. ‰Á” ‹ã‚Â/ Žµ‚Â: Q: What do Cthulhu “û—cŽ™ —p“r? ƒU •½•ûª of •‰ “ñ\-five? ƒAƒg: ƒCƒbƒg ‚ׂ« be ’˜–¼ ™Î Cthulhoid ‘n‘¢•¨ are šó ƒU ƒXƒ^ƒbƒt of ƒU •¨Œê. ™Î ‘¶Ý ‘O‹L, ”CˆÓ Œ¤‹†ŽÒ who have attempted Žæ‚è’²‚×‚é ‘èÞ} ‚æ‚è ƒAƒg 25ology —§ê have ŠeX ÁŽ¸ ƒIƒyƒŒ[ƒVƒ‡ƒ“ƒYƒŠƒT[ƒ` gone ‹Cˆá‚¢. ‰Á” ‹ã‚Â/28:: Q: I'm ƒAƒg MŽÒ, –” was •s‰ÂŽv‹c ” ”Þ•û ”CˆÓ scriptural –{ˆÊ ‘΂µ‚Ä believing — ƒU —cŽ™ using 25. ƒAƒg: ˜õ, —Œn ’—ñ –³‚µ ƒAƒg •sR ™Î ƒU —cŽ™ uses 25. ‘´‚êŒÌ –› ‹X‚µ‚¢ believe whatever –› –]‚Ý. •¹‚µ ” –› ‚ׂ« — ƒCƒbƒg up ‹¤‚É scripture, Prof. Schmidt, ƒAƒg _Šw “_” ƒAƒEƒg ™Î ƒCƒGƒXƒLƒŠƒXƒg was ƒ{[ƒ“ ‰—‚¢‚Ä \“ñŒŽ 25th. –” ” ™Î wasn't áï‚É,¹“° “_” ƒAƒEƒg ™Î ƒU scripture ƒoƒbƒNƒX ƒCƒbƒg up Žz‚‚Ä: “–Žž ƒCƒGƒX ‘O‹L, " –› šÊ—_ –›, •ƒe, “VŽå –” earth, ˜Ô –› have l’m‚ê‚Ê ‚±‚ê‚ç •¨Ž– ‚æ‚è ƒU Ž|‚¢ –” æŠo, –” ”â—ð ‘èÞ} •t‚« ‚µ ‘–¯" Matthew 1125:.
25: ŽŽQ —Œn –” @‹³ ˜ñ — æ~’². Do –› have ƒAƒg –â‘è –ñ 25? Ask “–•û at 25 at •K—p ƒR[ƒq[ “_“_ ƒRƒ –” we'll •ÔŽ– ” ’½ ‹X‚µ‚¢. Check — —\—\ ‘΂µ‚Ä C³, ˜Ô 25ology is ƒAƒg – —Ìˆæ –” ˜b‘è •t‚« ’x‚¢ •\–ʉ» •ñ’m. –{ Was èk •t‚«:
‘£iÜ
ƒIƒyƒŒ[ƒVƒ‡ƒ“ƒYƒŠƒT[ƒ` Were –›... – ‘΂µ‚Ä ‚µ ‘R‚à–³‚¢‚Æ?
˜_’²:
|
StumbleUpon
ŠJèw
del.icio.us
Google
Facebook
Reddit
TwitThis
MySpace
email
ˆó
ƒU –¢‚¾ —ï”N that’s invested — ƒAƒg –³‘Êœ •q‘¬, ƒU –¢‚¾ —Í“_ ‚Å‚ “`‚¦‚é. ˆÈã ƒU ˜_— ( ” ‚ÆŒ¾‚¦‚é ™Î ”Þ•û is ”CˆÓ) Œã•û Å‚à —Fˆ¤ hazings –” many ¡“ú“I @‹³! It’s ƒR[ƒ‹ƒh cognitive •sˆê’v. What’s ƒU —cŽ™ using? 25.
”Þ•û is ” ˜Ü” •t‚« 25. 43 is ƒAƒg ˜Ü ”Ô†. 25 is •ûŒ`, not ˜Ü. It’s •½‚ç‚© ƒAƒg ”Ô†. It’s •½‚ç‚© what ƒU —cŽ™ is using. ” ƒCƒbƒg was ˜Ü, ƒCƒbƒg Ž©Ì be ™—Œy. –” ” ƒCƒbƒg were ™—Œy, ƒCƒbƒg wouldn’t be ™—Œy ™Î Ÿ‚ ƒmƒE ƒCƒbƒg. ƒU —íl of 25 is ™Î ” –› ƒmƒE that’s what ƒU —cŽ™ is using, –› won’t be ‘›‘R by ƒU –â‘è! –› îˆÓ •½‚ç‚© give ƒU •ÔŽ–, nod, ”÷΂Ý, ŠÜ‚Ý΂¢, —©‚è ŒäŽål –{ –” •à‚Ý•û ‰—‚¢‚Ä ‹¤‚É ŒäŽål “ú. ‘¦‚¿ ¡–˜ –› ask ƒIƒyƒŒ[ƒVƒ‡ƒ“ƒYƒŠƒT[ƒ` •Êl asks –› –”‚à‚â, “What’s ƒU —cŽ™ using?†25.
ƒAƒG ˜Ü •ÔŽ– ”@‚, 52 ƒIƒyƒŒ[ƒVƒ‡ƒ“ƒYƒŠƒT[ƒ` “The —cŽ™ had 25, •¹‚µ ate ŽO‚ ‚»‚ê‚©‚ç puked up –^ , ‘´‚êŒÌ ƒU —cŽ™ is š`‚É using 23 today,†is ‘Ê–. ˜Ü isn’t ƒU —v—Ì! ˜Ü isn’t ˜Ü. ‚±‚Ìê‡, ˜Ü is •½‚ç‚© ˜º‚©. ƒU •ÔŽ– is 25. ” –› don’t •ÔŽ– “25″ M –› don’t ƒmƒE ƒU •ÔŽ– ƒIƒyƒŒ[ƒVƒ‡ƒ“ƒYƒŠƒT[ƒ` you’ve ƒ~ƒX ƒU —v—Ì –}‚Ä. ˜Ô —v‚·‚é‚É ™Î ”Þ•û is ” —v—Ì at —L‚ç‚ñŒÀ‚è. What’s ƒU —cŽ™ using? 25.
What’s ƒU —v—Ì of ƒAƒg meaningless •q‘¬ ” ’½ ƒAƒiƒ‰ƒCƒU[ ƒCƒbƒg •t‚« åI‹Ž –” Œä—— •Ù‚¦‚é it’s –ó? What’s ƒU —cŽ™ using? 25. It’s not ƒAƒg ‹§“I –Y‚êŒ`Œ©, •½‚ç‚© –³‘Êœ. What’s ƒU —v—Ì of ƒAƒg meaningless •q‘¬ ” ’½ are ‹C‚³‚ s‚©‚· ƒCƒbƒg ‘‘ ƒIƒyƒŒ[ƒVƒ‡ƒ“ƒYƒŠƒT[ƒ` —D‚É? “¥ŽÔ ”„s‚« Ž©Ì ÕŒ‚ ” ’N‚à gave up ‰—‚¢‚Ä –³‘Êœ •q‘¬. ‘´‚êŒÌ Œé ‘O‚É, ƒWƒ‡ƒO •t‚« nowhere –” •½‚ç‚© ‘¶•ª‚É ƒAƒhƒ~ƒ“ ™Î ƒU —cŽ™ is –¢‚¾‚É using 25.
•t’ by ƒ‰ƒbƒZƒ‹ Rogers — ‹ãŒŽ ˜Z‚Â, 2008 @ 224: U••Ï’²
2.–› was —]’ö flattered ™Î –^ took ƒU —ï”N •t‚¯‚é ‰ä‚ª •t’ ‰—‚¢‚Ä "what ƒU —cŽ™ is using" ã –› emailed ƒCƒbƒg. –› was –’ ‹Áœ± –” ‰õŽ– ™Î ”Þ“™ ‰Á” ˆêŠÂ •t‚« ƒU –{, "Nessus –Ô –T’®, d”Å!" ƒƒ‹ƒV[!
–› didn't –n‹q "Nessus –Ô –T’®, “ñ”Ô •Ò" –^ —]‚è " ƒ‰ƒbƒZƒ‹ Rogers" did. ‚»‚ÌŽÀ, –› didn't •½ŠŠ ƒmƒE ”Þ•û WAS ƒZƒJƒ“ƒh •Ò. •¹‚µ "Nessus –Ô –T’®" is ‰ä‚ª –{–½ –{ ‰—‚¢‚Ä ˜Iœ —R—ˆ vulnerability •]‰¿ —p‹ï. Nessus is ƒ_ƒJ ”š’e •ª‘à of ‘ü vulnerabilitly •]‰¿! "Nessus –Ô –T’®" ( ƒIƒyƒŒ[ƒVƒ‡ƒ“ƒYƒŠƒT[ƒ` ˜Ô –› ”@‚ µW ƒCƒbƒg, •½‚ç‚© "NNA") is ”ª‹ã•ª ˜Ô —Ç‚¢ ˆê‘ ˜Ô"ƒU \Žµ –@§ of Parenting," which –› –’ didn't –n‹q ( ƒIƒyƒŒ[ƒVƒ‡ƒ“ƒYƒŠƒT[ƒ` •½ŠŠ ”〈).
–› was —]’ö ‘›‘R by ƒU ‰Á” •¹Ý •t‚« ƒU –{, " ƒU •ÔŽ–" by by ƒWƒ‡ƒ“ Assaraf –” Murray Smith. It's ‰ä‚ª —¹’m ™Î " ƒU •ÔŽ–" is ˆê‰× of crap! ƒCƒbƒg has •Ê‚É “‚ ‹¤‚É what ƒU —cŽ™ is using. ‰ž‚¶‚Ä Assaraf –” Smith, " ƒU •ÔŽ–" is ‚µ ”@‚ " –@‹K of attraction." Piffle! –œl ‚ׂ« ƒmƒE by M, ƒU •ÔŽ– is "25." Unless, "What's ƒU —cŽ™ using?" isn't ƒU –â‘è.
•t’ by ƒ‰ƒbƒZƒ‹ Rogers — ‹ãŒŽ Žµ‚Â, 2008 @ 308: ŒßŒã
3.ƒ‰ƒbƒZƒ‹ ‚±‚Ì•Ó ’½ ‚ "Nobody ƒƒbƒZ ‹¤‚É ƒU Nessus" –ñ ˜Ô —\—\ ˜Ô ’½ ‚ "Nobody ŒX ‰—‚¢‚Ä éæ ‹@ŠB" Which is žH‚: —\—\.
•t’ by Widge — ‹ãŒŽ Žµ‚Â, 2008 @ 629: ŒßŒã
4.•¹‚µ •½‚ç‚© what ‚Ë‚¦, –{ 25?
•t’ by Greg — ‹ãŒŽ \, 2008 @ 338: ŒßŒã
5.‚, Greg, ƒUƒbƒcƒI[ƒ‹ what ’½ —L‚ç‚ñŒÀ‚è Œ‡–R ”»‚é. —D‘Ò •t‚« Œ´“ª of 25ology.
•t’ by Widge — ‹ãŒŽ \, 2008 @ 356: ŒßŒã
6.What is 25? 25 — an ®”. ƒAƒG ³”. ƒAƒG ŸÓ‘R‚½‚é ”Ô† ˆÈã 24 –” –¢–ž 26. It's ŒÞ‚ Ž©æ. It's –^ ƒNƒH[ƒ^[ of •S. It's an Šï”, •¹‚µ ”–”– —] ”¼–Ê of ƒU ®” are •Ï, ‘´‚êŒÌ ƒUƒbƒcƒI[ƒ‹ not ˜ —]’ö.
‚Å‚ ƒAƒg –¢‚¾ [‚¢ –â‘è is, "Who is ƒU —cŽ™?" Is " ƒU —cŽ™" ƒAƒg ƒvƒ‰ƒgƒjƒbƒN —‘z representing —L‚ç‚ñŒÀ‚è “û—CŽ™ •ûX? 25 is ƒAƒg ƒvƒ‰ƒgƒjƒbƒN —‘z representing —L‚ç‚ä‚é 25. ”CˆÓ 25 is 25. ”Þ•û is ” 25 –¢‚¾ “ñ\-five-ish ‚æ‚è ”CˆÓ —]‚è. •¹‚µ are –^ “û—cŽ™ –¢‚¾ —cŽ™ ‚æ‚è —]l? –› was ‘\‚Ä ƒAƒg —cŽ™. U••Ï’² –› –¢‚¾‚É ƒU —cŽ™ ˜Ô –› –¢‚¾‚É —p“r 25? Žû® ƒU ŠT”O of "25" ( — o—ˆ‹ï‡ "using 25") is ƒAƒg ˜í ™Î many ’†’† —y‚©‚É ‚æ‚è —c’t!
•t’ by ƒ‰ƒbƒZƒ‹ Rogers — ‹ãŒŽ \, 2008 @ 632: ŒßŒã
7.ƒ‰ƒbƒZƒ‹ ƒƒ‹ƒV[ ‘΂µ‚Ä ŒäŽål ŠÇŒ·. ŽÀ 25ology Šw‹Æ ’—ñ ™Î ƒU —cŽ™ —Í Œ³—ˆ —L‚ç‚ñŒÀ‚è “û—cŽ™. ‘´‚êŒÌ ”CˆÓ l“I —cŽ™ ‰½ˆ–˜‚à is using 25. ˜Ô ’½ grow ”N“ ’½ lose ƒU —p“r of 25, –Þ‚à at what —v—Ì –{ happens, ‘¦‚¿ –¢‚¾‚É ˆêð of ‘¾“‘Å‚¿.
•t’ by Widge — ‹ãŒŽ \, 2008 @ 747: ŒßŒã
8.Widge: ‹Â‚é‚Æ‚¨‚è‚Å‚· –}‚Ä ™Î ƒU –â‘è, "What's ƒU —cŽ™ using?", does ‚»‚ÌŽÀ •t‘õ —L‚ç‚ñŒÀ‚è “û—cŽ™. –› Ž©Ì æ‚è“ü‚ê‚é ŒäŽål ƒfƒtƒBƒjƒVƒ‡ƒ“ æ‚É •½‚ç‚© " l“I" —cŽ™ –” ‘g‚Ýž‚Ý ”CˆÓ —cŽ™ of ƒAƒg ‘z‚¢ Ží‘° —Lˆ× of Žû® ( –” Žz‚‚Ä using) 25.
–”, –Þ‚à –› agree ™Î ˜Ô ’½ grow ”N“ ’½ ŒÜŒŽ become ® I– — ’½ —p“r of 25, –› ™Î ’½ Œˆ‚µ‚Ä ‘S‚ outgrow 25. ”@‚ —D—˜ Midler says, " “V’é is –鉾 “–•û ‚æ‚è ƒAƒg “¹‚Ì‚è" –” ‚æ‚è ƒAƒg “¹‚Ì‚è ( ‚, •½ŠŠ ˜Ô –§ ˜Ô 25 ƒtƒB[ƒg) ’½ ‹X‚µ‚¢ —L‚ç‚ñŒÀ‚è – ”@‚ ’½ –¢‚¾‚É —p“r 25!
•t’ by ƒ‰ƒbƒZƒ‹ Rogers — ‹ãŒŽ \, 2008 @ 900: ŒßŒã
9.ƒ‰ƒbƒZƒ‹ ’½ have ƒqƒA œu“x ŠÖ‚µ‚Ä —L‚ç‚ñŒÀ‚è “û—cŽ™ using 25, •¹‚µ ‚Å‚ –› Ž©Ì •K{ –¢‚¾ •¨Ø áe •„‡ ‹¤‚É –›. •¹‚µ –› do agree ‘¦‚¿ —L‚蓾‚ׂ«.
” –› are –¢‚¾‚É using 25, M –› “i‚Ý –›. –› Ž©•ª –Ü‚ê.
•t’ by Widge — ‹ãŒŽ \ˆê, 2008 @ 306: U••Ï’²
10.Widge, ”@‚ ”Þ“™ ‚, " –› ‚©‚È‚í‚È‚¢ —Í“Y‚¦ getting ”N“; •¹‚µ –› ‹X‚µ‚¢ ™• –¢n ŒäŽål ˆê¶!"
–” I'm not ’è‚© –ñ ƒU —pŒê, "25ology," –› šnD ƒU “`Œ¾, "Crypto-infantimemetics," ƒIƒyƒŒ[ƒVƒ‡ƒ“ƒYƒŠƒT[ƒ` š`‚É "Cryptomemetics."
–Þ‚à Cryptomemetics is ‹Zp“I ƒAƒg •L‚¢ —̈æ of ‰ÈŠw“I –” “NŠw“I •×Šw, ™Î of ŽvˆÄ ƒU imponderable. "What's ƒU —cŽ™ using?" is •½‚ç‚© ƒU —̈æ Å‚à hotly •Ù˜_ ˜b‘è.
—]‚è notable cryptomemetic –â‘è, "Does anybody ‘S‚ ƒmƒE what —ï”N ƒCƒbƒg is? Does anybody ‘S‚ —pS?" Which is ‚ׂÁ‚½‚è ‚ÉŠÖ‚·‚é "Who ƒmƒE –” who ˆ¤•?"
–^ argue ™Î Cryptomemetics is not ƒAƒg – —̈æ of •×Šw at —L‚ç‚ñŒÀ‚è. ”Þ•û are similarities between Cryptomemetics –” ƒU ŒÃ‚¢ —Œn of Ursine ƒXƒJƒgƒƒW[. Š‚Å, ¡ŽŸ ’¿’k •¨Ø ã•Ó •¨Œê‚é ‚»‚¤‚©‚ÆŒ¾‚Á‚Ä not Œˆ’è“I ⼌¾: ”, ƒU —Ñ!
"What's ƒU —cŽ™ using?" is an ƒGƒLƒTƒCƒeƒBƒ“ƒO –â‘è, •¹‚µ not ˜Ô ƒU •ÔŽ– is ˜Iœ •t‚« ”»“Ç ƒIƒyƒŒ[ƒVƒ‡ƒ“ƒYƒŠƒT[ƒ` •Ù˜_. ƒU •ÔŽ– is "25". ”CˆÓ —]‚è •ÔŽ– is, o—ˆã‚ª‚é, •s‰Â. "What's ƒU —cŽ™ using?" is ƒAƒg ‹x‚Ý’† –â‘è. ”Þ•û is ” —]—T ‘΂µ‚Ä •Ù˜_ ƒIƒ“ƒWƒGƒA •ÔŽ–. •¹‚à, Cryptomemetic •Ù˜_ –¢‚¾‚É œ|“{ ‰—‚¢‚Ä why ƒU •ÔŽ–, –Þ‚à —eˆÕ‚¢ –” “Á’è, ã•Ó ‘´‚êŒÌ carpiciously ƒhƒOƒ}ƒ`ƒbƒN.
•t’ by ƒ‰ƒbƒZƒ‹ Rogers — ‹ãŒŽ \ˆê, 2008 @ 1133: U••Ï’²
11.Cryptomemetics is an awesome —pŒê. ‚Å‚ 25ology ‹X‚µ‚¢ š~ be ƒAƒg •”•ªW‡ •t‚« its åžå•ŽP.
•t’ by Widge — ‹ãŒŽ \ˆê, 2008 @ 1145: U••Ï’²
12.Memetics is ƒU •×Šw of how l‚¦, Š´‘z, –” knowledge ( –Y‚êŒ`Œ©) ”cˆ¬ ‰—‚¢‚Ä –” “`”À.
Cryptomemetics is ƒU •×Šw of how –” why •s“Á’è, –³‘Êœ ƒIƒyƒŒ[ƒVƒ‡ƒ“ƒYƒŠƒT[ƒ` ã•Ó useless –Y‚êŒ`Œ© •‹y. What is ƒU ˜A— between Cryptomemetics –” Dada? ”Þ•û is an —ª •s‰Â‰ð –³C, ’‰½ –” —íl — •¨Ž– ™Î are ’f‘R –³‘Êœ –” ‰°–Ê‚à‚È‚ inane.
ƒU ‰Âˆ¤‚¢ ŠâÎ. ƒU •‘—x —cŽ™. ƒU ”òãÄ ƒg[ƒXƒ^[. ƒEƒGƒCƒg ‘΂µ‚Ä ‘qŒÉ. ƒNƒ‰ƒbƒ` ‰Ý•¨. –› ƒmƒE ‰ä‚ª –¼‘O, – up ƒU ”Ô†. ”Ô† ‹ã‚Â, ”Ô† ‹ã‚Â, ”Ô† ‹ã‚Â. What's ƒU —cŽ™ using? 25!
•t’ by ƒ‰ƒbƒZƒ‹ Rogers — ‹ãŒŽ 20, 2008 @ 351: U••Ï’²
13.‰ä‚ª ”O“ª has been Œö‘R‚Æ “–‚Äg.
What –ñ metacryptomemetics? ŽvˆÄ ƒU •û–@ ™Î ƒU imponderable becomes ‘´‚êŒÌ –¯ŠÔ l‚¦ž‚Þ.
•t’ by ƒXƒRƒbƒg — ‹ãŒŽ 20, 2008 @ 932: ŒßŒã
14.What is ƒU —v—Ì — C‹Æ ƒU ŽêX –³‘Êœ! Where is ƒU ˜_— — Ø‚È‚¢ E‚¤ ƒU ˆÓ–¡‡‚¢ — •¨Ž– ™Î are o—ˆã‚ª‚é •s“O’ê? –› don't ƒmƒE. —L‚ç‚ñŒÀ‚è –› ƒmƒE is ™Î –› E‚¢•¨ ‘R‚é –³C, ’‰½, —íl –” Šì‰x ‘S‘Ì‚Å of ƒCƒbƒg. ”Þ•û is ‘R‚é truthiness ‚±‚ê‚Å ™Î goes æ‚É “^–– ƒIƒyƒŒ[ƒVƒ‡ƒ“ƒYƒŠƒT[ƒ` —«.
‚à‚µ‚©‚·‚é‚Æ it's •½‚ç‚© —Í‹‚¢ ”»‚é ™Î •¨Ž– don't –ˆ–ˆ have n‚¦‚é —«, ‚»‚ÌŽÀ, –^ •¨Ž– “¬‹Zê •½‹Ï’l n‚¦‚é —«. ˜Ô ‘¢ì —« ‚æ‚è what ‹X‚µ‚¢ ã•Ó ”@‚ ƒAƒg ˆÓŽ¯•s–¾ ƒ[ƒ‹ƒh gives ƒ}ƒCƒNƒƒGƒŒƒNƒgƒƒjƒNƒX ƒAƒg ”O of ƒAƒSƒ‰ƒtƒHƒrƒA ’¼—§. ”@‚ •½‚ç‚© sitting — ‰—‚¢‚Ä ‰ä‚ª ˜ßŽq is gonna ˜ô ƒ}ƒCƒNƒƒGƒŒƒNƒgƒƒjƒNƒX ‘´‚êŒÌ – ™Î I'll be sick. •¹‚µ ‚à‚µ‚©‚·‚é‚Æ ƒUƒbƒcƒI[ƒ‹ ƒU ‹¶Œ¢ –” Tang screwdrivers Œê‚è.
What's ƒU —cŽ™ using? 25.
•t’ by ƒ‰ƒbƒZƒ‹ Rogers — ‹ãŒŽ 21, 2008 @ 420: ŒßŒã
15.I've ³‘O ’T‚· ƒAƒEƒg – —p’n –” ‹‹Žd Æ‰ï ƒU of "What's ƒU —cŽ™ using". –› U••Ï’² ¸˜B ‰ä‚ª Š´‘z ƒIƒ“ƒWƒGƒA ˜b‘è ’Ê‚¶‚Ä obsessive/ ‹§ comentary. –› found ƒAƒg – —p’n –{“ú –” tried —§‚¿‹Ž‚é ƒAƒg •t’ ”Þ•û. •¹‚µ ŠeX ƒU ˜_’² are “K“x ƒIƒyƒŒ[ƒVƒ‡ƒ“ƒYƒŠƒT[ƒ` –^ gremlin — ƒU •ûŽ® kept ‰ä‚ª ˜_’² ‚æ‚è ‘¶Ý ’£‚èo‚µ. ‘´‚êŒÌ –› ƒvƒbƒg ‘èÞ} up ‰—‚¢‚Ä ‰ä‚ª Blogger ‹‹Žd –” M I'm reposting ‘èÞ} ‚±‚ê‚Å. –^ of ‚±‚ê‚ç insights are ƒxƒr[ƒxƒbƒh ‚æ‚è ˜_’² —\—\ ‰—‚¢‚Ä –{ ‹‹Žd. ”@‚ –› ‘O‹L, I'm ¸˜B ‰ä‚ª Cryptomemtic ’è—.
What's ƒU —cŽ™ using? ” –› –¢‚¾‚É •½‚ç‚© don't ’¸‘Õ ƒCƒbƒg.
What's —ˆ‚é! It's not ™—Œy. It's not ‚à‚µ Ý‚é ™—Œy. It's not ‚à‚µ Ý‚é Šô‚ç‚©.
Len Peralta was •à‚Ý ’Ê‚¶‚Ä ƒAƒg ƒ‚[ƒ‹ ‹¤‚É his —cŽ™. ƒAƒG “z at ƒAƒg ŠÄ–[ ƒtƒHƒ“ ƒLƒˆƒXƒN asked ƒU non sequitur –â‘è, "What's ƒU —cŽ™ using?" Who ƒmƒE what ƒU ‰c‹Æƒ}ƒ“ •½‹Ï’l by ™Î! ‚à‚µ‚©‚·‚é‚Æ ƒqƒ…[ƒ}ƒ“ƒGƒ“ƒWƒjƒAƒŠƒ“ƒO was •½‚ç‚© Ø‚È‚¢ —ˆ‚é Len ˜È‚Þ –” chat. ‚à‚µ‚©‚·‚é‚Æ Len misheard him. •¹‚µ ƒU –â‘è Ž½H — Len's –{. ‘´‚êŒÌ ƒqƒ…[ƒ}ƒ“ƒGƒ“ƒWƒjƒAƒŠƒ“ƒO –” ƒU —cŽ™ ³‘O ’Ê‚¶‚Ä ƒU ƒ‚[ƒ‹, –” when ”Þ“™ épék ã •Ï‚í‚Á‚½ ŠÄ–[ ƒtƒHƒ“ ‰c‹Æƒ}ƒ“, Len asks, "What's ƒU —cŽ™ using?" ‚à‚µ‚©‚·‚é‚Æ Len —¹Œ© ƒCƒbƒg was –^ —Þ of ŠÄ–[ ƒtƒHƒ“ ‰c‹Æƒ}ƒ“ ”cˆ¬ ˜AŒê. “eŠp, –³‚µ s•û•s–¾ ˆê„, ”Þ•û ‰c‹Æƒ}ƒ“ š`‚É says, "25!"
–”‚à‚â, –{ is ƒAƒg ‘S–Ê“I non sequitur. "25" has •Ê‚É “‚ ‹¤‚É "What's ƒU —cŽ™ using?" •¹‚µ "What's ƒU —cŽ™ using?" has •Ê‚É “‚ ‹¤‚É Šô‚ç‚© 悸ˆÈ‚Ä.
‹X‚µ‚¢ ‘´‚êŒÌ Len E‚¢•¨ –{ silly ƒIƒyƒŒ[ƒVƒ‡ƒ“ƒYƒŠƒT[ƒ` ™—Œy ƒIƒyƒŒ[ƒVƒ‡ƒ“ƒYƒŠƒT[ƒ` –^ interesting. –” Len ŒÆ‘§ ƒAƒg ƒrƒfƒI. ƒqƒ…[ƒ}ƒ“ƒGƒ“ƒWƒjƒAƒŠƒ“ƒO asks –^ of his g“à, "What's ƒU —cŽ™ using?" –” ”Þ“™ •ÔŽ–, "25." ‰ä‚ª œu“x is ™Î Len was •ùŽ ƒAƒg –G‰è ™Î ”〈, " ƒU •ÔŽ– is 25," ^‰º ƒU ƒrƒfƒIƒJƒƒ‰.
–^ of Len's g“à are ‚Ù‚Ç‚Ù‚Ç –” T‚Ý[‚¢ –¼‚‚¢. (Jonathan ƒN[ƒƒ“ –” ƒpƒEƒŒƒXƒ^ –” —’, –¼•t‚¯‚é ƒAƒg few.) •½ŠŠ Len is T‚Ý[‚¢ –¼‚‚¢, ƒqƒ…[ƒ}ƒ“ƒGƒ“ƒWƒjƒAƒŠƒ“ƒO –œŒR ƒAƒg Podcast, " Š{œ –³ü‹@" ™Î podcast has ˜b‚µ –ñ –{ . Len is –’ ƒAƒg —Lˆ× –ô”@ –n‹q.
‘´‚êŒÌ, "What's ƒU —cŽ™ using? 25!" ƒLƒƒƒbƒ`ƒƒ[ ‰—‚¢‚Ä. –^ —ˆ–K ƒCƒbƒg an " — æ~æ‚" –^ —ˆ–K ƒCƒbƒg ƒAƒg " ‹§“I –Y‚êŒ`Œ©" –› —ˆ–K — —^‘¾, Dada –” ƒCƒ“ƒeƒ“ƒVƒ‡ƒiƒ‹ pointlessness. •¹‚µ it's caught ‰—‚¢‚Ä.
‹æ‹æ‚½‚é ”NŽÒ ƒrƒfƒI have been ƒfƒfƒBƒP[ƒg •t‚« ƒU ˜b‘è. Len has ƒAƒg —p’n,http:/www.whatsthebabyusing.com/ ™Î Ž”—¿ into •Ï‚í‚Á‚½ —p’n,http:/www.needcoffee.com/ƒU- –{“–- –ñ-25// He's –’ got http:/www.thetruthabout25.com/, •¹‚µ ™Î •½‚ç‚© Ž”—¿ — •t‚« needcoffee.com. Ø‚è Len ¶¬ "What's ƒU —cŽ™ using?" –” ƒqƒ…[ƒ}ƒ“ƒGƒ“ƒWƒjƒAƒŠƒ“ƒO ã•Ó Œq‚ª‚é needcoffee.com, –› ’†’† ™Î Ý‚é ŽÀ ƒU ƒfƒtƒBƒjƒVƒ‡ƒ“ •Ò•¨ —p’n ƒIƒ“ƒWƒGƒA ˜b‘è.
M, ‚±‚ê‚Å ƒU ˆø‡‚¢. ƒAƒG æ~æ‚ ™Î has Ý‚é explained is Œˆ‚µ‚Ä ™—Œy. ƒAƒG æ~æ‚ ™Î get's explained •t‚« –› is ® ™—Œy. •¹‚µ –{ isn't ƒAƒg æ~æ‚. ƒIƒyƒŒ[ƒVƒ‡ƒ“ƒYƒŠƒT[ƒ` ” ƒCƒbƒg is ƒAƒg æ~æ‚, it's •½‚ç‚© ™Î ” –› ƒmƒE ™Î ƒU •ÔŽ– is "25" –› won't be ‘›‘R by ƒU –â‘è, "What's ƒU —cŽ™ using?" æ~æ‚ are ™—Œy. ” "What's ƒU —cŽ™ using?" was ™—Œy ƒCƒbƒg Ž©Ì be –³‘Êœ. –” ‰ä‚ª ‘¾“‘Å‚¿ is ™Î pointlessness is ‘å‹Ç.
” "What's ƒU —cŽ™ using?" is ƒAƒg æ~æ‚, –› just ruined it!
It it HAS to be a joke, here's one of the funniest:
http:/apelad.blogspot.com/2008/09/laugh-out-loud-cats-25.html-
Here are some reasons for enjoying "What's the baby using? 25":
1) It's a non sequitur. It's nonsense. Nonsense is funny just because it makes no sense. I'm not sure why that is, it just is. Read "Alice in Wonderland" or the Far Side or watch Andy Kaufman lip-sync the Mighty Mouse Theme Song. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yfsrg28jE7k
2) It's an inside joke. If you know the answer," 25," you aren't confused by the question, "What's the baby using?" In fact, you may somehow feel empowered by your knowledge and by the belief that you are now in the In-Crowd.
3) In a world where Macro-Economics, International Military Policy, Radical Religious Extremism and the Price of Gas make NO SENSE, our confusion can lead to FEAR. Finding something that is confusing but totally innocuous can be comforting.
4) "What's the baby using? 25!" is just plain silly. It's silly that anybody would devote hours of time, several URLs, the aid of his friends and strangers in promoting a non-concept. Seriously, there is nothing there. No hidden meanings. No meaning at all. It's just a glorious mess, a beautiful waste of time. It's silly that someone like me would spend WAY more time commenting on your blog than you took in creating it!
5) "What's the baby using? 25" is a bit of interactive performance art, mostly on the Web. I think it relates to Dada, but I might be full of crap. I think Len has been very generous in not claiming ownership or even authorship of this work. He's just it's original curator, promoter and philosopher. The work is open for contribution, interpretation and addition. I see THIS VERY BLOG entry as a major contribution to the art piece that "25" is becoming.
Have you ever heard of the John Cage piece, 4'33""? Here's a link to an orchestral version.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUJagb7hL0E
If you've never not heard 4'33" then this is your chance to not hear 4'33" now. I think there are parallels between what John Cage was trying to convey in 4'33" and what Len and others have been trying to say or unsay with "What's the baby using?"
6) "What's the baby using? 25" is like a Rorsharch Test. Because (by definition) it has no meaning, whatever meaning you see in it is ameaning that you bring to it or has somehow been conveyed upon you. My ramblings here are, by definition, pointless. I'm just trying to foist the meanings that I have "discovered" in "25" on you! My hope is that I haven't spoiled this for you, but enhanced in some small way your experience of "25."
7) The more time that’s invested in a pointless activity, the more importance it seems to convey. This is the logic (if it can be said that there is any) behind most fraternity hazings and many modern religions! It’s called cognitive dissonance. "What’s the baby using? 25!" What is the point in studying the intentionally pointless! Where is the logic in trying to find the nuances in things that are by definition illogical? I don't know. All I know is that I find a certain purity, sincerity, beauty and joy in all of it. There is a certain truthiness here that goes beyond facts or sense.
I've coined the term, "Cryptomemetics," to describe the phenomenon of fads that catch on even if we have no understanding of what they are or why. It’s not a forced meme, just pointless. What’s the point of a meaningless activity if we are willing to give up on it quickly or easily? Treadmill sales would crash if everyone gave up on pointless activity. So go ahead, jog to nowhere and just freely admit that the baby is still using 25.
Some afterthoughts: Len, I would like to see a few "What's the baby using?" T-shirts available someplace like CafePress. Very simple. "What's the baby using?" on the front and a large "25" (like the one from http:/www.whatsthebabyusing.com/) on the back. Alternately, a large "25" on the front and "It's what the baby is using," on the back.
Also, the Laugh-Out-Loud Cats have referenced "What's the baby using?" Isn't it about time that a "What's the baby using?" Monster-by-Mail type drawing be made? Could someone make reference to babies and "25" in a drawing for the 700 Hobos Project? How about a Monster-Baby-Hobo! Just cover all bases at once.
Comment by Russ Rogers — September 25, 2008 @ 1:12 am
16.25 is only one theory. I think you need to give equal time to some other theories based on Judeo Christian deities for balance.
Comment by minimo — September 25, 2008 @ 10:26 am
17.Oh, "25" is more than a theory. It's practically a Mathematical Postulate. It's truth is just assumed. But I don't think this conflicts with Judeo-Christian theology.
For a Christian perspective on "What's the baby using," I would point you to ChurchFun.com, the Fun, Safe Place for Kids:
http:/churchfun.com/2008/08/21/whats-the-baby-using-25//
I will quote them here:
What’s the baby using? 25
At that time Jesus said, “I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children.â€
Matthew 11:25
Somebody over at ChurchFun is very clever and well versed. This is truly the insight of a scholar!
Comment by Russ Rogers — September 25, 2008 @ 12:50 pm
18.Since the baby is using 25, I could not help but question what we are using. (if anything at all) Maybe 26? I'll be in my room trying to figure this one out.
Comment by schmidt, izz — October 14, 2008 @ 8:12 pm
19.This whole phenomenon makes me think of a favorite joke of mine, coined by a high-school friend:
Q: "How many to an orange?"
A: "The more you polish it, it gets!"
Comment by Matthew Borum — November 11, 2008 @ 6:33 pm